Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
medrxiv; 2023.
Preprint en Inglés | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2023.03.07.23286107

RESUMEN

This retrospective study utilized healthcare claims data to investigate the incidence, patient demographics, and concurrent diagnoses associated with long COVID in the U.S. Medicare population. Nearly 194,000 (0.6%) beneficiaries had post-COVID condition diagnoses, with higher rates among nursing home residents. Of those medically attended for COVID-19, 3-5% were diagnosed with post-COVID conditions. We observed minimal demographic differences between those with and without long COVID. When comparing diagnoses concurrent with long COVID and COVID-19, certain codes (G72 and J84) for myopathies and interstitial pulmonary diseases were disproportionately present with long COVID.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Musculares , Enfermedades Pulmonares
2.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint en Inglés | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.05.13.21257177

RESUMEN

Background: Blood donors are increasingly being recognized as an informative resource for surveillance. We aimed to review and characterize SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence studies conducted using blood donors to investigate methodology and provide guidance for future research. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed and preprint publications between January 2020 to January 2021. Two reviewers used standardized forms to extract seroprevalence estimates and data on methodology pertaining to population sampling, periodicity, assay characteristics and antibody kinetics. National data on cumulative incidence and social distancing policies were extracted from publicly available sources and summarized. Results: Thirty-three studies representing 1,323,307 blood donations from 20 countries worldwide were included (sample size per study ranged from 22 to 953,926 donations). Seroprevalence rates ranged from 0% to 76% (after adjusting for waning antibodies). Overall, less than 1 in 5 studies reported standardized seroprevalence rates to reflect the demographics of the general population. Stratification by age and sex were most common (64% of studies), followed by region (48%). 52% of studies reported seroprevalence at a single time point. Overall, 27 unique assay combinations were identified, 55% of studies used a single assay and only 39% adjusted seroprevalence rates for imperfect test characteristics. Among the eight nationally representative studies case detection was most underrepresented in Kenya (1:1264). Conclusion: As of December 11, 2020, 79% of studies reported seroprevalence rates <10%; thresholds far from reaching herd immunity. In addition to differences in community transmission and diverse public health policies, study designs and methodology were likely contributing factors to seroprevalence heterogeneity.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA